<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which should I use, a blog or a wiki?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nirak.net/2007/05/29/which-should-i-use-a-blog-or-a-wiki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nirak.net/2007/05/29/which-should-i-use-a-blog-or-a-wiki/</link>
	<description>Karin Dalziel</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.nirak.net/2007/05/29/which-should-i-use-a-blog-or-a-wiki/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 23:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirak.net/2007/05/29/which-should-i-use-a-blog-or-a-wiki/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I get this question a lot as well. The best way I can think of to explain it is to say something along the lines that a wiki is for "book-like" content and a blog is for "newspaper-like" content.  That seems to get the big idea through so more of the details could be talked about in a proper context.  The analogies may not be the most accurate, but I find it sets the table in a good way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get this question a lot as well. The best way I can think of to explain it is to say something along the lines that a wiki is for &#8220;book-like&#8221; content and a blog is for &#8220;newspaper-like&#8221; content.  That seems to get the big idea through so more of the details could be talked about in a proper context.  The analogies may not be the most accurate, but I find it sets the table in a good way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.nirak.net/2007/05/29/which-should-i-use-a-blog-or-a-wiki/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nirak.net/2007/05/29/which-should-i-use-a-blog-or-a-wiki/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Oh, man - this is the kind of thing I love to think about. To some extent, the question seems similar to, "I want to build a thing, which should I use: A hammer or a screwdriver?"

I think you hit it on the head: A wiki provides organizational latitude that a blog doesn't, which is clear when it is considered that some blogs are implemented on top of wiki infrastructure.

Blogs are typically linear, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_%28data_structure%29" rel="nofollow"&gt;stack-like&lt;/a&gt;,
and linked to external resources, while wikis are more densely linked internally, and more &lt;a&gt;graph-like&lt;/a&gt; in structure.

In a blog, the information presented is organized chronologically, though the imposition of categories and search provide alternate, possibly dynamic organizations. The organization of information in a wiki is much more dependent on the semantic content information presented. On the other hand, wiki pages mutate over time, while blog entries tend to be relatively static.

A blog can be collaborative, with many authors (e.g. Boing Boing), comments, etc. A wiki can be restricted to having a single editor.

I would use a blog for reporting events, making announcements, a diary.

I would use a wiki for documentation, "information with an emergent structure" (that is, a bunch of related stuff I'm not sure how to organize), an encyclopedia, a quick-and-dirty content managment system (like the &lt;a href="http://www.hartleyneighborhood.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Hartley Neighborhood Association site&lt;/a&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, man - this is the kind of thing I love to think about. To some extent, the question seems similar to, &#8220;I want to build a thing, which should I use: A hammer or a screwdriver?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you hit it on the head: A wiki provides organizational latitude that a blog doesn&#8217;t, which is clear when it is considered that some blogs are implemented on top of wiki infrastructure.</p>
<p>Blogs are typically linear, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_%28data_structure%29" rel="nofollow">stack-like</a>,<br />
and linked to external resources, while wikis are more densely linked internally, and more <a>graph-like</a> in structure.</p>
<p>In a blog, the information presented is organized chronologically, though the imposition of categories and search provide alternate, possibly dynamic organizations. The organization of information in a wiki is much more dependent on the semantic content information presented. On the other hand, wiki pages mutate over time, while blog entries tend to be relatively static.</p>
<p>A blog can be collaborative, with many authors (e.g. Boing Boing), comments, etc. A wiki can be restricted to having a single editor.</p>
<p>I would use a blog for reporting events, making announcements, a diary.</p>
<p>I would use a wiki for documentation, &#8220;information with an emergent structure&#8221; (that is, a bunch of related stuff I&#8217;m not sure how to organize), an encyclopedia, a quick-and-dirty content managment system (like the <a href="http://www.hartleyneighborhood.org/" rel="nofollow">Hartley Neighborhood Association site</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
