Subscribe to: Posts Comments Photos Links All feeds in one 222 Posts and 322 Comments till now

Archive for August, 2006

Academia and Intelligence

I don’t know how to talk about these things without stepping on toes. And I’m sure that many of my observations are flat out wrong. Please take anything I say with a very large grain of salt.

There are a lot of thoughts swirling around in my head today. It’s making me a little dizzy.

I’ll pick one to write about, one that’s been on my mind a lot. I have not written about it yet because I don’t know quite how to express it without sounding like an ass, but here goes anyway.

Here at University, there is a definite caste system (see, that is the wrong thing to say already) of employees- you have the Chancellors and presidents and all those people first, then you have faculty (of which the above mentioned are part of, but higher than). As it turns out, faculty can be pretty vague as a term. In the library journals I’ve been reading, there’s a lot of discussion about whether librarians are faculty at various schools, and whether that’s a good or bad thing. Sometimes, librarians will have most of the rights and responsibilities of faculty, but not the actual title. Sometimes, they will hold the title, but with different responsibilities. Oddly enough, one study found that the lower tier the school, the more likely librarians will be classified as faculty. (Bolger)

I’m getting away from the point.

The point is, that in this caste system, I am the lowest of the low- an assistant, and I have “only” a bachelor’s degree. I noticed that there is a big difference in how I am treated, though, once I begin saying things like “I’m taking classes for my Master’s.” I’m no longer just someone who has their bachelors, but someone working on attaining a Masters, but that still does not put me as high as, say, someone working on a PhD. I can tell that for some faculty, this raises my value in their eyes. This bothers me for a lot of reasons.

First, school does not equal intelligence. I know a lot of people that are very intelligent and have a bachelors or no degree at all. There’s a lot of reasons one might choose not to go to college or pursue a degree past a bachelors- some jobs simply don’t require it, and I suspect that many of the people I know found school to be boring, repetitive, and unnecessary (my Bachelors was pretty much that way until my senior year). Plus, college is charging more and more every day, with no guarantee that you will get what you paid for with your degree. I also know a few people with higher degrees that are not that intelligent- they know a lot when it comes to a specific subject, but beyond that, they are quite hopeless.

Second, even if a degree confers some measurement of intelligence, at least on average, intelligence does not necessarily mean that a person will do a job better. A less “intelligent” person (I put intelligent in quotation marks because it depends on how one measures intelligence) might do a particular job as well or better than a more intelligent person. Of course, what a degree signifies more than intelligence, I think, is an ability to commit yourself to something, so it may indeed be a good indicator of being able to follow a project through.

Considering these things, I don’t understand why there is such a division between “faculty” and “everyone else” - there’s plenty of faculty only meetings, committees, etc. Not that I want to be part of these meetings, because I have quite enough as it is, but I wonder what the point is. I imagine they all go to a special secret room and don hoods and eat fancy foods or something. (kidding!)

Obviously I need to give this topic more thought. but my gut reaction is:

I am not my education.

Of course, I would probably look at this differently if I held a PhD. I hope that, whatever education I acquire, I won’t forget that there are plenty of people out there smarter than me, and most of them don’t hold a college degree. I also hope that, even should I fail to get a Master’s because I find some other path that I don’t beat myself up over it, because, again, I am not my education.

—-
Bib
—-

Bolger, D. F., & Smith, E. T. (2006). Faculty status and rank at liberal arts colleges: An investigation into the correlation among faculty status, professional rights and responsibilities, and overall institutional quality. College & Research Libraries, 67(3), 217-229.

Private vs public on the Internet

Initiator:

an identity of bits and pieces

In the real world the ability to keep distance between social spheres is fundamental to the ability to controlling your identity; there is no distance in cyberspace. Your info is no longer dispersed among the different spheres of shopping sites, email, blogs, comments, or bulletin boards, reviews. Search engines collapse that distance completely and your distributed identity becomes an aggregate one; one we might not recognize if it came up to us on the street.
There are two ways to react: 1) with alarm: attempt to keep things wrapped in layers of protection, possibly remove it entirely, and call for greater control and protection of our personal information. Or 2) with grace: acknowledge our multiple identities, and create a meta-identity, while still making a call for better control of our personal data.

I’ve been thinking about this very topic quite a lot recently. The fact that I am merging more and more of my online existence into my web page, and linking my web page from my disparate online hangouts makes it so that people can find out potentially embarrassing things about me, if they really dug. Or, if not potentially embarrassing, at least things I wouldn’t want them to know.

It’s really amazing to me the things that people will put on websites under their own name. I can find out who ex coworkers are dating, or just sleeping with. I can find out who people hang out with. I can find out who is posting during work hours. All this, with a few clicks.

I think part of the reason that myspace has such an appeal is that it is a place where few adults (that is, adults my parents age, not my age) penetrate beyond perhaps looking up their son or daughter to make sure there’s not predatory activity going on. But the surface doesn’t show much, the real activity goes on in comments, and groups, and all kinds of other places that myspace doesn’t make it all that easy to discover. I’m not sure if myspace has been deliberate in this way, or if it has just grown out of an expansion beyond means, but it serves it’s purpose: it hides information.

I digress. my point is, anyone can search anything about me. I stopped using aliases years ago, and my main alias, nirak, is the name of this site and also my name backwards, so it’s not that hard to figure out. In the past, I treated the Internet as intensely private and now, I view it as a public extension of myself. I try not to put anything on it I wouldn’t want others to see, unless it’s in a password protected domain. Instead of trying to separate online persona’s, I’m trying to merge them- so the real me is a combination of the stupid, inane posts I make on a bulletin board, and research papers, and flickr photos, and artwork. That’s really what everyone is- even the most intelligent people like and say stupid stuff once in a while, and smart people can be gullible.

It’s not that I don’t have different sides I show to different people - everyone does. It’s just I want to keep those sides at least mostly for actual human interaction.

Oh, and by the way, I may change my mind about all this tomorrow, unlink everything, and say “oops, my bad, I don’t want you to know this.” This is kind of an experiment in openness, one that may turn out to be a bad one.

Work in Progress: Projects: Nebraska State Capitol

I am working on a new page to go with my Nebraska State Capitol page, and I wanted to use Thickbox 2.0 but I can’t figure out how to make it work with an image map. Hmpf.

At least I got Thickbox working - it was ridiculously easy.

Here’s the Page

Abacus: A demonstration.

I was watching a show on my computer the other night. A character used an abacus to do calculations, which got me wondering- what exactly is an Abacus, and how does one use one?

In the old days, I might make a note to myself and look it up later, perhaps in an encyclopedia. No more, though! All I had to do is pause the show, toggle over to Firefox, type in “wp abacus” and “poof!” there’s Wikipedia’s entry for “Abacus.”

This is what I truly love about the internet.

OK, I can’t say that I’m all that clear on exactly how one uses an Abacus. I realized that what I think of as an Abucus is actually the Chinese Abacus, or “suanpan.” There is a tutorial for learning to use the Abacus. I’ll have to save that for another day.

Gaming in Libraries?

Interview with Steven Markley

I was just talking about this with friends last night. Gaming is so maligned, it seems. I don’t get it. All the gamers I know are creative and funny, and are also those “nice guys” that you hear so much about.

« Prev - Next »